|
|
On 20.05.11 09:46, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> [after reading Thorten's message above]
> ... and which shows, there is a semantic problem, difficult to solve in
> fact. Increased by the number of non-native speakers among us.. I have the
> impression that many people (me included) not always realise that Object
> Modifiers is much more than just transformations. :-) The contained_by in
> isosurfaces is also an object modifier, strictly speaking.
>
> I think that in this case, there should be a little sentence in the docs
> just stressing that all isosurface parameters have to be placed *before*
> any object modifier.
Actually, this rule applies to many object modifiers in other objects as
well. It is not a unique behavior in isosurfaces. And it is documented.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|